Political News

Withdrawing US Troops from Germany not Included in Upcoming NATO Summit

Withdrawing US Troops from Germany

Senior administration officials said discussions of withdrawing U.S. troops from Germany will not be included in next week’s NATO summit, despite reports that President Donald Trump has considered the move.

White House officials have pushed back against those reports for the past week, since a Washington Post piece noted that the Pentagon, at Trump’s request, is analyzing the national security impact and cost savings of a large-scale withdrawal of U.S. forces from Europe.

About 35,000 American troops are currently stationed in Germany, a significant hub for U.S. military operations worldwide. Trump in the past has repeatedly complained about NATO allies not shouldering enough responsibility, financially and personnel-wise, for the alliance’s security operations.

In a press call with reporters on Thursday, U.S. Representative to NATO Kay Bailey Hutchison said that those broader cost concerns would be a key point of the upcoming NATO summit, set to start July 11.

“Every one of our allies are already increasing defense spending,” she said. “That is something we will talk about as an achievement, but also recognize we need to do more.”

Other topics for the summit include the ongoing NATO mission in Afghanistan, extending alliance membership to Georgia and Ukraine, and emerging threats to member countries.

But a senior administration official said the issue of U.S. troops in Germany is not on the agenda, and there are no plans for Trump to threaten removing American forces from the country if NATO allies do not continue to step up their own military investments.

The official went even further, calling the current U.S. force strength there a key strategic point of American military strategy and national security, and said plans in coming months call for closer relationships among U.S. and Germany military forces, not fewer.

Hutchison characterized the tone of the upcoming summit in Brussels as positive, “everyone has the same goal, and that is a strong deterrent and an alliance that is unified”,  despite Trump’s past criticisms of NATO.

Germany pays 1% (slowly) of GDP towards NATO, while we pay 4% of a MUCH larger GDP. Does anybody believe that makes sense? We protect Europe (which is good) at great financial loss, and then get unfairly clobbered on Trade. Change is coming!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 11, 2018

At a South Carolina rally last month, the president said that America is “the piggy bank that (NATO) likes to take from” and promised changes in the relationship in the near future.

“We like to help out, but it helps them, they’re in Europe,” he said. “It helps them a lot more than it helps us, we’re very far away.”

Hutchison also said that NATO representatives at next week’s summit will discuss Russian aggression in Eastern Europe and other “malign activities” by the country.

Trump is scheduled to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in the days following the summit. Lawmakers have expressed concern that Trump has not taken an aggressive enough stance with Russia on a host of national security issues.

Weapon Blog News

 

In Other News:

US Failed to Renegotiate Arms Control Rule

France Armed Forces Ministry New Digital Revolution

Related posts

Edward Snowden Set-Back Pentagons Move to Recruit Hackers

Weapon Blog

Lawmakers Warn President Trump Russia is Bad Actor

Weapon Blog

US House Introduce Bill to Stop Aid to Saudi Arabia

Weapon Blog

Leave a Comment